zlacker

>>alden5+(OP)
> "We actually serve over lasers all of our users on Starlink at a given time in like a two-hour window"

I can't figure out what this sentence means.

>>lupusr+165
I think it means pretty much all Starlink users have at least some data go over laser links every two hours. Which is a bit of surprise to me, if true. I have a year or so of fine-grained latency detail taken with IRTT on a Starlink connection, I should sit down and see if I can see times I'm using a satellite. Latency is highly variable in Starlink though so it's pretty noisy data.

>>Nelson+VF5
Hey, I’m very curious if you’ve seen any improvement in latency over the past month.

>>quailf+qZ6
not in the last month but I had a major improvement 11 months ago. still not clear what they did, but best guess is shifting load.