zlacker

[return to "Stories removed from the Hacker News Front Page, updated in real time"]
1. a12k+Q2[view] [source] 2024-02-02 16:35:27
>>Robin8+(OP)
Looking at the list of removed stories makes me really happy with the moderators here. They're all sensationalist, advertising for some company, clickbait, way off topic, or some combination of above. In fact, I don't see a single story that I personally feel should not have been removed.

Thanks, mods.

◧◩
2. reduct+i81[view] [source] 2024-02-02 21:44:01
>>a12k+Q2
I witnessed a recent front page link silently get changed to point to a parody video, then silently changed back later, with the top comment that remarked on the change silently removed.

That told me all I needed to know about the moderation of this site.

Thankfully someone captured a screenshot: https://merveilles.town/@cancel/111834048502040552

◧◩◪
3. mkl+zj1[view] [source] 2024-02-02 22:54:40
>>reduct+i81
Dang explained it was a mod error: >>39182625 , which links to >>39170137

huppeldepup's comment in the screenshot is collapsed on p2 of the comments (after it was no longer relevant) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39157010&p=2, and is also accessible as the parent of >>39170137 .

◧◩◪◨
4. paulco+PR1[view] [source] 2024-02-03 05:09:53
>>mkl+zj1
What did you think he was going to say? Explain that it was in fact a big HN conspiracy?

I mean yeah it probably was just a mistake but what do you expect somebody to say?

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dang+fT1[view] [source] 2024-02-03 05:31:33
>>paulco+PR1
You just need to move your game theory to a different level. The expected value of lying about such things is super negative and the expected value of telling the truth is super positive.

I'm sure there's a model in which lying some of the time but not too often has marginally higher expected value, but it's also going to have significantly higher risk and that's not worth it, plus you have to be disciplined enough to actually apply such a strategy. One slip and you're dead! I'm too lazy for that.

[go to top]