zlacker

[return to "Stories removed from the Hacker News Front Page, updated in real time"]
1. ggdG+ib[view] [source] 2024-02-02 17:10:08
>>Robin8+(OP)
> In fact, I don't see a single story that I personally feel should not have been removed.

I don't understand why this story was removed: "It turns out the six-feet social-distancing rule had no scientific basis", >>39200511

On a forum with an overwhelmingly science-minded audience, it bothers me that an important topic like that is deemed untouchable.

◧◩
2. tptace+ug[view] [source] 2024-02-02 17:35:24
>>ggdG+ib
Stories about COVID controversies are almost certainly getting flagged off the front page by users, not touched by mods. People look at the titles of these stories and think that's all flaggers are going by, but lots of people flag stories based on their experience of what the threads are like, and the threads on COVID controversies are fucking dreadful. I didn't flag (or see) that story, but I would have.
◧◩◪
3. vertic+6j[view] [source] 2024-02-02 17:46:25
>>tptace+ug
But why must they be dreadful? Genuine question, I am not being obtuse. We should be able as a community to discuss conterversial subjects somehow.

I also think this sort of thing invites flag brigades. Or better yet, a small batch of bad actor can easily start brigading and forcefully associate such flamewar expectations with any subject they don't like to drive it off HN.

Maybe worth reconsidering how you flag? You might be getting played. Or not, I really don't know. No obvious answers.

◧◩◪◨
4. tptace+hp[view] [source] 2024-02-02 18:12:55
>>vertic+6j
I don't know why they're dreadful, but they empirically are, and that's the end of the matter for me.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. vertic+zq[view] [source] 2024-02-02 18:19:07
>>tptace+hp
I think this sort of thing taken to the limit will cut every which way until eventually we run out of subjects and the overton window shrinks into an overton dot.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. _Alger+8t[view] [source] 2024-02-02 18:30:01
>>vertic+zq
The risk that the quality of discourse on HN falls to Reddit leveles of shitposting seems a greater one to me. Having high volume of popular highly polarized discussions seems a great way to have an Eternal September[2] event, and there is no way to recover what makes a forum unique after that.

HN is a single place on the internet with clear moderation guidelines[1]. It doesn't have to cater to every form of speech. In fact, actively not doing so is probably the reason why HN's level of discourse is comparatively high.

People who want Reddit should go to Reddit, not drag HN with them through the mud.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September

[go to top]