zlacker

>>whoish+(OP)
Not a "Wants to be Hired", just did a quick technology survey of the responses out of curiosity at what's being listed down to the top 30 mentions for skill alignment purposes and areas where there are probably many resumes. Compared:

>>39217310 Who's Hiring Feb 2024

>>39217308 Who Wants to be Hired Feb 2024.

Mentions of Item in (Technologies:) | Mentions in Who's Hiring (not specific or filtered)

python: 83 | 49, react: 53 | 48, aws: 46 | 33, javascript: 42 | 14, typescript: 41 | 43, sql: 35 | 25, nodejs: 34 | 21, linux: 29 | 9, docker: 27 | 12, ruby[ on rails]: 24 | 10, go[lang]: 28 | 21, css: 21 | 1, postgres[ql]: 36 | 24, java: 19 | 11, rust: 19 | 45, c++: 17 | 18, c#: 16 | 7, html: 16 | 4, express: 14 | 1, mongodb: 14 | 3, bash: 13 | 1, javascript/typescript: 13 | 2, mysql: 11 | 2, terraform: 11 | 6, kubernetes: 11 | 9, c: 11 | 7, git: 9 | 32, scala: 9 | 3, flask: 9 | 2, php: 8 | 6

>>araes+VC1
Might be interesting to also cover areas / specialties like "devops", "security", etc.

And count who is only interested in remote. That ratio seems to be _way_ higher here than on the general market, to no particular surprise.

>>maxvt+ZD1
Totally agree on the additions, just happened to be 15-20 minutes of Excel twiddling and sort rather than working out an extensive database.