zlacker

>>pg+(OP)
I have a query for the userbase: how much do you think the quality of this site would go down is URLs from Techcrunch were banned?

I suggest that it wouldn't be very much :-).

>>tsally+v4
TC reviews of startups are the most reliable, in the sense that a) there will always be one (TC is thorough) and b) the quality and viewpoint is fairly consistent so they're more valuable because you know the bias, as opposed to a review from some random site.

>>pchris+59
Somehow I don't accept consistent bias as an acceptable aspect of a review, or any journalism piece for that matter.

>>tsally+fe
This is the internet. Surely something with a consistent bias is the lesser evil compared to an unknown bias.