zlacker

[return to "Garry Tan tech CEO and campaign donor wishes death upon SF politicians"]
1. Andrew+73[view] [source] 2024-01-28 04:52:30
>>Nelson+(OP)
It’s getting harder and harder to want to contribute to this community further. Goddamn.
◧◩
2. bdcrav+B4[view] [source] 2024-01-28 05:09:25
>>Andrew+73
It seems that there's enough of a divide between HN and YC. As I posted elsewhere, look at the common values expressed on HN, and you'll find plenty of YC startups that are diametric opposites of those values. In the many years I've participated in online forums, I still find HN to be the most well-moderated I've ever experienced.
◧◩◪
3. jacobj+ql[view] [source] 2024-01-28 09:14:59
>>bdcrav+B4
Enough of a divide? This isn’t the first post about him that I’ve seen flagged
◧◩◪◨
4. dang+TQ1[view] [source] 2024-01-28 20:42:10
>>jacobj+ql
We didn't flag the post; users did. When it comes to submissions, that's nearly always the case - see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html.

Now that I've seen it I suppose I need to figure out what we should do in this case. The general principle is that we moderate less, not more, when YC is part of a story (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...).

In this case, I suppose we can satisfy that rule by taking [flagged] off the post and leaving the sensational title instead of editing it the way we normally would.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. arp242+Kf2[view] [source] 2024-01-28 23:51:40
>>dang+TQ1
I'm one of the people who flagged it because it's mostly just boring partisan pissing contest. It doesn't pass the "intellectual curiosity" test.

I'm fairly relaxed about this sort of thing (e.g. some stories about Gaza and such should definitely on HN), but "firebrand says firebrand-y thing" ... yeah, that doesn't really fit. It's neither especially interesting or especially notable and we could have a story about this every week; perhaps even multiple.

What would be on-topic would be a an in-depth profile about this person, or something like that.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. jerome+WI3[view] [source] 2024-01-29 14:46:33
>>arp242+Kf2
I don't know if I buy this. He did a death threat, he's the CEO of YC, that seems like something that belongs on HN, YC's community forum.

You might not be interested, that's totally fair, then don't upvote.

But flagging it so that people don't know the CEO of the community is expressing death threats? I feel like we should know. We shouldn't be learning about YC/HN from other sites and have it censored/flagged within the community.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. pstuar+eG4[view] [source] 2024-01-29 18:45:54
>>jerome+WI3
It wasn't a a death threat but it would be safe to say that it expresses his sentiments. Being drunk is a partial excuse but it's a serious faux pas and he should own it rather than pretend it never happened.

I haven't lived in SF for years but the city government is legendary for it's ability to not serve its constituents (which obviously isn't unique).

I can't believe I'm defending a tech bro....

[go to top]