zlacker

[return to "I used to not worry about climate change. Now I do [video]"]
1. renewi+o9[view] [source] 2024-01-27 17:28:09
>>onnnon+(OP)
There’s nothing much to do. An environmentalist told me that it’s a few big companies that are causing it all but that I was greenwashing it by buying Terrapass so now I’ve stopped. I grew up in the city, too, but apparently that was the problem because you’re surrounded by a concrete jungle so now I’m buying a home in the hills. It’s pretty cool, honestly. I don’t understand why everyone doesn’t just live in the hills since it’s better for the environment.
◧◩
2. nindal+9a[view] [source] 2024-01-27 17:31:04
>>renewi+o9
Wouldn't per capita emissions in a city be lower? Simply because of transport - we're far more likely to use public transport than folks living in rural areas.
◧◩◪
3. random+Ek[view] [source] 2024-01-27 18:27:05
>>nindal+9a
But use transport daily. Ironically, at least in the typical North American city, you can’t do anything without a machine to take you over long distances.

In the rural area, you maybe travel once a week to stock up but otherwise don’t need transportation at all.

◧◩◪◨
4. Whoppe+Yk[view] [source] 2024-01-27 18:30:06
>>random+Ek
The bicycle machine emits nothing and can be used pretty easily in cities.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. random+Ul[view] [source] 2024-01-27 18:36:33
>>Whoppe+Yk
Emits nothing only if you ignore the engine. Some studies suggest that human CO2 emissions increase eightfold while exercising.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. lo0dot+lz[view] [source] 2024-01-27 19:57:44
>>random+Ul
A car is more or less efficient than cycling, depending on the food, car and source of electrical power, and manufacturing CO2 production. The bicycle production emits a less CO2 than the car production, tilting the comparison at the beginning of the lifecycle of both.

The GHG emissions associated with food intake required to fuel a kilometre of walking range between 0.05 kgCO2e/km in the least economically developed countries to 0.26 kgCO2e/km in the most economically developed countries.

A Tesla model 3 according to WLTP test cycle uses

0.191 kWh / km * 0.434 kgCO2e/kWh = 0.083 kgCO2e / km

Sources

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-66170-y https://www.tesla.com/de_DE/support/european-union-energy-la... https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/co2-emissionen-pro-kil...

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. random+XA[view] [source] 2024-01-27 20:07:30
>>lo0dot+lz
The alternative is to stay close to home, not drive a vehicle of any kind. But the North American city, strangely, scatters everything over large distances, making life impractical without a machine to carry you.
[go to top]