zlacker

[return to "Amazon's Ring to stop letting police request doorbell video from users"]
1. paxys+tb[view] [source] 2024-01-24 17:35:50
>>nickth+(OP)
The title incorrectly implies that police can no longer ask users for surveillance video, while the actual change is that Amazon itself is going to stop sharing it without a warrant. You can of course do anything with your video you want, including giving it to police.
◧◩
2. g42gre+8j[view] [source] 2024-01-24 18:06:21
>>paxys+tb
It looks like Bloomberg wrote this misleading article and put this title up, deliberately, on purpose. I don’t think it’s the OP’s fault. I wonder what else Bloomberg publishes on, in the same way?
◧◩◪
3. redcob+Ql1[view] [source] 2024-01-25 00:26:02
>>g42gre+8j
Can you help me understand why the article/title is "misleading" or what their motive would be to do so "deliberately, on purpose"?

I genuinely don't get the angle here you're suggesting Bloomberg has.

[go to top]