zlacker

>>lopken+(OP)
I find this kind of data interesting and hope we can pick out what’s biological and what’s social/cultural.

It seems like there used to be more of these “look at these interesting results” type discussions but are fewer now that just posting things can upset people and gather lots of folks meta debating instead of digging into knowledge development and understanding.

>>prepen+Z1
Isn’t everything biological? How can something magically only be cultural? There is a root of behavior and that’s biology. Men are on average larger, more aggressive, stronger, etc. of course this would influence culture.

>>asylte+B2
I don’t think only, but can be a factor.

For example, I think lots of fashion is some factor of culture and not biology. That’s why costumes are different in Germany than China.

And there are things that are biology (height, etc). It’s interesting to find what’s nature and what’s nurture.