zlacker

>>linker+(OP)
I’m really worried this will become common practice. We MUST fight against this otherwise they will take away open source from us. Making an integration to work with devices you own is NOT ILLEGAL. I’m happy to contribute to a qualified and trustworthy gofundme to protect devs. I myself have a few integrations I made and would refuse to take them down. Granted, I intentionally don’t use any “cloud” api garbage.

>>asylte+ma3
not only will it be common practice but likely also the law.

upcoming legislation in Europe mandates secure-boot for any IoT device sold by 2025 in EU. this and the cybersec resilience act will ensure only firmware shipped and signed by the vendor are able to boot :) ... so your comment is spot-on.

>>Dyslex+nj3
What legalization is that? That's atrocious and only serves to fuck the end user.

>>beeboo+MD3
legislation?

Radio Equipment Directive which now has a huge cybersec impact. So if you want to sell hardware in EU it must be certified

here is a lot of what will be in there. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/303600_303699/303645/02...

the final standard is not the above but based on the ideas in ETSI.

While the above applies mostly to the "thing" the cloud and edge that enable services for IoT will be covered by the hotly debated CRA:

>>38818734

>>38787005