zlacker

>>Philpa+(OP)
This is why I think that C++ will be around in the next 50 years but Rust? I can't tell.

>>twen_t+s7
Some might think C++ will take years (few years I was hoping 2025, but seems unlikely now) to catch up to Rust in some important ways.

>>silon4+Jm
C++ is losing momentum as larger organizations lose interest in investing in it. Features standardized in c++20 are still not available in the most popular compilers, let alone features in c++23. The future is looking bleak.

Rust is a great alternative for greenfield projects but we really need a new kotlin-esque innovation to keep c++ alive imo.

>>surajr+zS
> Features standardized in c++20 are still not available in the most popular compilers

"A few years" was also the feature support cadence of '17 through '11 features.

And, before that, the 3-year release cycle wasn't a thing yet.