Std: Clamp generates less efficient assembly than std:min(max,std:max(min,v))

>>x1f604+(OP)
Both recent GCC and Clang are able to generate the most optimal version for std::clamp() if you add something like -march=znver1, even at -O1 [0]. Interesting!

[0] https://godbolt.org/z/YsMMo7Kjz

>>tambre+2i
But then it uses AVX instructions. (You can replace -march=znver1 with just -mavx.)

When AVX isn’t enabled, the std::min + std::max example still uses fewer instructions. Looks like a random register allocation failure.

>>Grumpy+Wk
The additional "movapd xmm0, xmm2" is mostly free as it is handled by renaming, but yes, it seems a quirk of the register allocator. It wouldn't be the first time I see GCC trying to move stuff around without obvious reasons.

zlacker