zlacker

>>greeni+(OP)
Where is the Free Speech Absolutist outrage? What happened to the answer to bad speech is more good speech?

Can I conclude that both of those positions are by and large rhetorical shams?

>>bedige+F
> They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words.

The next part talks about how they fall silent when pressed hard, but that was before the internet. Now they slip back, disappear, and re-emerge elsewhere. We don't even have the pleasure of their silence.

>>kelsey+i5
Ironically, it is the Trump supporting types that seem to really enjoy explaining their positions. Left wingers cannot handle being pressed hard -- particularly in a corporate setting -- about things like DEI and other matters they are unwilling to cede.

Press me as hard as you want! I can defend my positions easily and without getting emotional.

>>k33n+f8
The mistake here is in casting left-wingers as the alternative to Trump, when Trump is so far beyond the right-wing event horizon that even Reagan-era republicans would oppose him. Please understand that the world is not so simple as left vs. right.