zlacker

>>gnufx+(OP)
"I think that AI is always plagiarism," he [Bruce Perens] said

>>crater+y1
> ”I think that AI is always plagiarism," he says. "When you train the model, you're training the model with other people's copyrighted stuff.”

This is certainly true of OpenAI and Google. But Adobe Firefly is trained on only on their own Adobe Stock images, licensed content, and public domain content.

>>Charle+09
This is just a batshit insane thing for a person who supposedly promotes the creative commons to say. Plagiarism isn't learning how to write articles like the NYT or how to write code like Linus or RMS. That's still the case if I program my computer to do it.

>>Quantu+aA1
I think it makes sense. Plagiarism is literally taking someones work/ideas and passing them off as my own. If I were to read 100 NYT articles(one of which is about some event) and then write my own article afterwards that uses similar details of the event or is laid out in similar ways, that's plagiarism.

When you program a machine to do the same thing but 1000x more efficient, it's still plagiarism.

>>Xelyne+XE1
Outside an academic setting plagiarism is just called "thought".