zlacker

>>treebr+(OP)
Very interesting, especially the huge jump forward in the first figure and a possible majority of AI researchers giving >10% to the Human Extinction outcome.

To AI skeptics bristling at these numbers, I’ve got a potentially controversial question: what’s the difference between this and the scientific consensus on Climate Change? Why heed the latter and not the former?

>>bbor+D6
Because the AI human extinction idea is entirely conjecture while climate change is just a progression on current models.

What’s the progression that leads to AI human extinction ?