zlacker

>>qainsi+(OP)
Hopefully they don't make the dogs breakfast that is Hulu -- there you can have a subscription "without ads" but then they show you adds on some content. There's no logic to determine which content gets ads and which doesn't, nor can you tell if you would be just as well off not subscribing to the no-ads level since you can't tell how many (if any) additional adds that would generate.

>>dboreh+Qc
Hulu has to show ads on a certain few shows due to contractual agreements.

Better than not being available, no?

If it upsets you, just pretend it doesn't exist.

>>pests+iD2
> If it upsets you, just pretend it doesn't exist.

Solving the world’s problem right here

>>foogaz+JT2
The problem of having Hulu show ads on some shows, when you pay for no ads? Shows you have to voluntarily watch?

This is a first world problem if I've ever seen one.

>>pests+Hu3
Do you not see the problem? "I paid for an electric car but i still have to add gas sometimes". "I paid for a combo but they didn't give me my fries".

You paid extra for something they haven't provided