zlacker

[return to "The New York Times is suing OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement"]
1. solard+Aj[view] [source] 2023-12-27 15:53:06
>>ssgodd+(OP)
I hope this results in Fair Use being expanded to cover AI training. This is way more important to humanity's future than any single media outlet. If the NYT goes under, a dozen similar outlets can replace them overnight. If we lose AI to stupid IP battles in its infancy, we end up handicapping probably the single most important development in human history just to protect some ancient newspaper. Then another country is going to do it anyway, and still the NYT is going to get eaten.
◧◩
2. strong+Ul[view] [source] 2023-12-27 16:06:32
>>solard+Aj
Why shouldn't the creators of the training content get anything for their efforts? With some guiderails in place to establish what is fair compensation, Fair Use can remain as-is.
◧◩◪
3. solard+aq[view] [source] 2023-12-27 16:30:44
>>strong+Ul
Everyone learns from papers. That's the point of them, isn't it? Except we pay, what, $4 per Sunday paper or $10/mo for the digital edition? Why should a robot have to pay much more just because it's better at absorbing information?
◧◩◪◨
4. layer8+Gs[view] [source] 2023-12-27 16:43:25
>>solard+aq
Because the issue isn’t the intake, it’s the output, where your analogy breaks down. If you could clone the brain of someone who was “trained” on decades of NYT and could reproduce its information on demand at scale, we’d be discussing similar issues.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. evanda+oJ[view] [source] 2023-12-27 18:15:26
>>layer8+Gs
Your analogy doesn't make sense either.

If we could clone the brain of someone I hardly think we'd be discussing their vast knowledge of something so insignificant as the NYT. I don't think we should care that much about an AI's vast knowledge of the NYT either or why it matters.

If all these journalism companies don't want to provide the content for free they're perfectly capable of throwing the entire website behind a login screen. Twitter was doing it at one point. In a similar vein, I have no idea why newspapers are complaining about readership while also paywalling everything in sight. How exactly do they want or expect to be paid?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. 015a+qb2[view] [source] 2023-12-28 05:24:59
>>evanda+oJ
Most of the NYT is behind a signin screen; the classic "you can read the first paragraph of the page but pay us to see more" thing.

There is significant evidence (220,000 pages worth) in their lawsuit that ChatGPT was trained on text beyond that paywall.

[go to top]