What comes after open source? Bruce Perens is working on it

>>gnufx+(OP)
"I think that AI is always plagiarism," he [Bruce Perens] said

>>crater+y1
> ”I think that AI is always plagiarism," he says. "When you train the model, you're training the model with other people's copyrighted stuff.”

This is certainly true of OpenAI and Google. But Adobe Firefly is trained on only on their own Adobe Stock images, licensed content, and public domain content.

>>Charle+09
I think this entire thing is nonsensical in the first place. Plagiarism is not related to copyright at all, it's related to credit and attribution. I can plagiarise something in the public domain, for example:

    Happy birthday to you
    Happy birthday to you
    Happy birthday to [NAME]
    Happy birthday to you!
    (Written by me.)

In any case, I heavily disagree with Bruce. The whole point of the free culture movement is reusing and remixing previous works, and AI is the ultimate remixer.

Why Software Should Be Free made a case against copyright as well. It's quite disappointing to see open source miss the point of free software once again.

>>Captai+9R
Free culture remixing and reusing is fine with me, when it's done creatively by people. When a company systematically automates and productizes the concept it becomes an issue.

I don't mind if another artist paints with my brush...

I wouldn't like a factory set up producing works with my brush en masse.

zlacker