zlacker

[return to "Amazon Prime Video starts showing ads in January unless you pay $2.99/month xtra"]
1. figass+O[view] [source] 2023-12-26 22:10:42
>>qainsi+(OP)
I feel piracy today is pretty morally excused.
◧◩
2. paulco+2a[view] [source] 2023-12-26 23:29:03
>>figass+O
I don’t. I know there are things that people expect me to pay money for and I feel bad about taking things that I know I shouldn’t.

And I don’t subscribe to the “but my HTTP requests” rationalization that’s so common here on HN.

◧◩◪
3. argiop+xb[view] [source] 2023-12-26 23:39:59
>>paulco+2a
Out of personal curiosity, how far does this go for you? Would you download (without paying for)

- an old film (the Maltese Falcon, Wizard of Oz, Wings [1927 silent film])

- a really bad film (Santa Claus Conquers the Martians)

- something you already own but don't have access to at the moment

- anime

- none of the above?

◧◩◪◨
4. paulco+Fm1[view] [source] 2023-12-27 13:43:51
>>argiop+xb
None of the above.

If I want to watch an old film, a bad film, or an old bad film, I pay for it or I don’t watch it.

I’ve bought films on Amazon rather than get off my butt to put the DVD in the player. So you can guess that if I don’t have access to it at the moment that I’ll pay for it. I bought the DVD, I didn’t buy the right to download the movie (unless it was one of those DVDs with a download code included).

I have 0 interest in anime.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. argiop+QF2[view] [source] 2023-12-27 21:19:09
>>paulco+Fm1
Thanks for taking the time to reply and satisfy my mostly aimless curiosity. As mentioned in a sibling, I probably should have gone with "cartoons" or "drivel" or similar for that category, but "anime" is my particular bias for that category of time waster
[go to top]