zlacker

>>ssgodd+(OP)
The arguments about being able to mimic New York Times “style” are weak, but the fact that they got it to emit verbatim NY Times content seems bad for OpenAI:

> As outlined in the lawsuit, the Times alleges OpenAI and Microsoft’s large language models (LLMs), which power ChatGPT and Copilot, “can generate output that recites Times content verbatim

>>Aurorn+84
Sarah Silverman is claiming the same thing about her book.

But I've tried really hard to get ChatGPT to output sentences verbatim from her book and just can't get it to. In fact, I can't even get it to answer simple questions about facts that are in her book but nowhere else -- it just says it doesn't know.

Similarly I haven't been able to reproduce any text in the NYT verbatim unless it's part of a common quote or passage the NYT is itself quoting. Or it's a specific popular quote from an article that went viral, but there aren't that many of those.

Has anyone here ever found a prompt that regurgitates a paragraph of a NYT article, or even a long sentence, that's just regular reporting in a regular article?

>>crazyg+e6
it is in the legal complaint - they have ten examples of direct content. I think they got very skilled people to work on producing the evidence.

>>mistri+w8
Ah thank you. The examples start on page 30.

I wish they included the prompts they used, not just the output.

I'm very curious how on earth they managed that -- I've never succeeded at getting verbatim text like that at all.

>>crazyg+x9
If they included the prompts, OpenAI would just patch them and say they fixed the problem.