zlacker

[return to "Amazon Prime Video starts showing ads in January unless you pay $2.99/month xtra"]
1. nyjah+3a[view] [source] 2023-12-26 23:29:07
>>qainsi+(OP)
This is such a bummer. Why does everything get worse? I actually really enjoy prime for movies and specifically for foreign movies.

I can’t stand all the freevee crap they have been forcing down our throats too. They pack a record amount of commercials into those movies and it’s all clunky when you pause and go back, or need to fast forward or rewind. Just wish there was better ways to get rid of the freevee crap, but if 2.99 gets rid of those ads too, I might be inclined to upgrade. I know it wil just be the stuff that has no ads now tho.

◧◩
2. jmyeet+7e[view] [source] 2023-12-27 00:03:28
>>nyjah+3a
> Why does everything get worse?

Because profits tend to fall over time [1] so to keep profits the same (let alone increasing) revenue have to go up and/or costs have to go down. More evenue can be higher prices, more subscribers, etc. Lowering costs can mean paying less in licensing, paying people less, employing less people, etc.

This was one of Marx's key observations of the inherent contradictions in capitalism.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tendency_of_the_rate_of_profit...

◧◩◪
3. nine_k+yf[view] [source] 2023-12-27 00:17:53
>>jmyeet+7e
Wait. The Marx's theory explains how things get commoditized, and the margins go to the smallest possible required to fund the actual production. If anything, it explains how prices drop in a price competition, and with them, profits drop, too.

What we see here is prices rising, in a landscape which is becoming more competitive.

◧◩◪◨
4. jmyeet+zq[view] [source] 2023-12-27 01:56:11
>>nine_k+yf
Commoditization is profits tending to fall. Which is why all the secompanies have to fight to maintain their profits. In this case by raising prices.

As for the streaming space, it honestly isn't that competitive. There aren't that many players. If anything, what we're seeing here is price leadership (which is price fixing and collusion but, you know, legal) Netflix raises their prices $2/month and weirdly Hulu, Disney and Max all follow suit. Strange how that works.

We saw the exact same thing with cable: bundling channels to maintain profits, channels charging more, increasing prices to counter losing customers, etc. And why were the channel prices going up to the cable TV providers? The exact same set of reasons relating to falling profits.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. redwal+RB[view] [source] 2023-12-27 03:51:37
>>jmyeet+zq
Entertainment is also not fungible. Each show is basically a mini monopoly granted by the existence of copyright law. So anyone who wants a specific show has to follow where it goes...and what we've seen is rights holders withdrawing from a market (third party distributors) that was fairly setting the price to vertically integrate distribution and command a higher price.

There's something to be said about the idea of not allowing content companies to own distribution...

[go to top]