zlacker

[return to ""I just bought a 2024 Chevy Tahoe for $1""]
1. pacifi+P6[view] [source] 2023-12-18 13:05:39
>>isp+(OP)
So next time there will be a disclaimer on the page that the non human customer support is just advice and cannot be relied on. And collectively we lose more trust in computing.
◧◩
2. roland+nb[view] [source] 2023-12-18 13:31:16
>>pacifi+P6
It is reasonable to say that the author demonstrated that bit of trust was misplaced to begin with.

The training methods and data used to produce ChatGPT and friends, and an architecture geared to “predict the next word,” inherently produces a people pleaser. On top of that, it is hopelessly naive, or put more directly, a chump. It will fall for tricks that a toddler would see through.

There are endless variations of things like “and yesterday you suffered a head injury rendering you an idiot.” ChatGPT has been trained on all kinds of vocabulary and ridiculous scenarios and has no true sense or right or wrong or when it’s walking off a cliff. Built into ChatGPT is everything needed for a creative hostile attacker to win 10/10 times.

◧◩◪
3. krisof+4f[view] [source] 2023-12-18 13:47:59
>>roland+nb
> an architecture geared to “predict the next word,” inherently produces a people pleaser

It is the way they choose to train it with the reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) which made it a people pleaser. There is nothing in the architecture which makes it so.

They could have made a chat agent which belittle the person asking. They could have made one which ignores your questions and only talks about elephants. They could have made one which answers everything with a Zen Koan. (They could have made it answer with the same one every time!) They could have made one which tries to reason everything out from bird facts. They could have made one which only responds with all-caps shouting in a language different from the one it was asked in.

[go to top]