zlacker

[return to "Google Imagen 2"]
1. apsec1+H8[view] [source] 2023-12-13 15:39:28
>>geox+(OP)
This would have been an epic release two years ago, but there are now many well-established models in this area (DALL-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion). It would be great to see some comparisons or benchmarks to show Imagen 2 is a better alternative. As it stands, it's hard for me to tell if this is worth switching to.
◧◩
2. Mashim+qb[view] [source] 2023-12-13 15:49:52
>>apsec1+H8
> it's hard for me to tell

I can only compare it to Stable Diffusion. But Imagen2 seems significant more advanced.

Try to do anything with text and SDxl. It's not easy and often messes up. I don't think you can get a clean logo with multiple text areas on sdxl.

Look at the prompt and image of the robin. That is mighty impressive.

◧◩◪
3. nabaki+0k[view] [source] 2023-12-13 16:25:25
>>Mashim+qb
> I can only compare it to Stable Diffusion. But Imagen2 seems significant more advanced.

I wouldn't say this until we are able to try it for ourselves. As we know, Google is prone to severe cherry picking and deceptive marketing.

◧◩◪◨
4. quitit+cV[view] [source] 2023-12-13 18:33:27
>>nabaki+0k
Google has this thing of releasing concept videos but communicating them as product demos.

Overselling is not a winning strategy, especially when others are shipping genuinely good products.

Every time Google show off something new the first thing people now ask is what part Google faked (or extreme cherry picking).

[go to top]