zlacker

>>anigbr+mB
If I'm ever fired for taking a pro-Palestinian stance, I will spend the rest of my life suing everyone involved. The capital community has crossed so many lines in their witch hunt for pro-Palestinan voices that it's not even funny. Our industry has reached a breaking point and I'm not sure what's going to happen since most of the VCs are extremely pro-Zionism and a huge portion of people under the age of 45 are pro-Palestinian, including most engineers and tech people I know.

>>hypeit+(OP)
I’m very pro-Palestinian. That’s yet another reason why I want Hamas gone. There’s no chance for social justice while terrorists are running the show.

>>ristla+Y21
Hamas will only end along with the Zionist occupation.

>>dontla+m61
How does this work out? Let's say Israel admits defeat and gives Hamas everything it wants. How does this remove Hamas from power?

>>dubcan+S81
It doesn’t automatically. But it can’t happen until the occupation ends. And ultimately Hamas gained prominence precisely because of the occupation which destroyed all other groups with any influence.

>>dontla+Sd1
You understand that your illogical and immoral death pact works both ways, right?

Who is dominant militarily? Does it look like the U.N. is going to be able to continue the theater of pulling the reigns on Israel?

There is a logical reason as to why civilians shouldn't be used as pawns in war. It green lights all civilians and tragically opens the door to ethnic cleansing.

And yet here you are arguing that the war can't end until Israel is removed. Literally demanding the terms, and guaranteeing the results, for the removal of Palestinians. Crazy talk, from someone who pretends to have the interests of the Palestinians at heart.