zlacker
[return to "The largest number representable in 64 bits"]
◧
1. IshKeb+db6
[view]
[source]
2023-11-27 20:50:18
>>tromp+(OP)
Meaningless question. If you allow arbitrary number formats you can just define 1 to be an arbitrarily large number.
◧◩
2. happyt+Uc6
[view]
[source]
2023-11-27 20:57:43
>>IshKeb+db6
This is pedantic. Even mathematicians - famous pedants - embrace the subjective concept of "non-trivial" answers.
[go to top]