zlacker

>>staran+(OP)
Some perspective ...

One developer (Ilya) vs. One businessman (Sam) -> Sam wins

Hundreds of developers threaten to quit vs. Board of Directors (biz) refuse to budge -> Developers win

From the outside it looks like developers held the power all along ... which is how it should be.

>>taway1+aP1
$$$ vs. Safety -> $$$ wins.

Employees who have $$$ incentive threaten to quit if that is taken away. News at 8.

>>jejeyy+xV1
Why are you assuming employees are incentivized by $$$ here, and why do you think the board's reason is related to safety or that employees don't care about safety? It just looks like you're spreading FUD at this point.

>>baby+3W1
of course the employees are motivated by $$$ - is that even a question?

>>jejeyy+0X1
No, it's just counter to the idea that it was "employee power" that brought sam back.

It was capital and the pursuit of more of it.

It always is.