zlacker

[return to "We have reached an agreement in principle for Sam to return to OpenAI as CEO"]
1. jafitc+F91[view] [source] 2023-11-22 14:31:43
>>staran+(OP)
OpenAI's Future and Viability

- OpenAI has damaged their brand and lost trust, but may still become a hugely successful company if they build great products

- OpenAI looks stronger now with a more professional board, but has fundamentally transformed into a for-profit focused on commercializing LLMs

- OpenAI still retains impressive talent and technology assets and could pivot into a leading AI provider if managed well

---

Sam Altman's Leadership

- Sam emerged as an irreplaceable CEO with overwhelming employee loyalty, but may have to accept more oversight

- Sam has exceptional leadership abilities but can be manipulative; he will likely retain control but have to keep stakeholders aligned

---

Board Issues

- The board acted incompetently and destructively without clear reasons or communication

- The new board seems more reasonable but may struggle to govern given Sam's power

- There are still opposing factions on ideology and commercialization that will continue battling

---

Employee Motivations

- Employees followed the money trail and Sam to preserve their equity and careers

- Peer pressure and groupthink likely also swayed employees more than principles

- Mission-driven employees may still leave for opportunities at places like Anthropic

---

Safety vs Commercialization

- The safety faction lost this battle but still has influential leaders wanting to constrain the technology

- Rapid commercialization beat out calls for restraint but may hit snags with model issues

---

Microsoft Partnership

- Microsoft strengthened its power despite not appearing involved in the drama

- OpenAI is now clearly beholden to Microsoft's interests rather than an independent entity

◧◩
2. nuruma+Db1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 14:40:06
>>jafitc+F91
Gpt-generated summary?
◧◩◪
3. Mistle+Gj1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 15:12:05
>>nuruma+Db1
That was my first thought as well. And now it is the top comment on this post. Isn’t this brave new world OpenAI made wonderful?
◧◩◪◨
4. nickpp+In1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 15:30:36
>>Mistle+Gj1
If it’s a good comment, does it really matter if a human or an AI wrote it?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. makewo+Qq1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 15:44:30
>>nickpp+In1
Yes.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. nickpp+Vr1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 15:49:19
>>makewo+Qq1
Please expand on that.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. iamfli+Iv1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 16:06:36
>>nickpp+Vr1
This is the most cogent argument against AI I've seen so far.

https://youtu.be/iGJcF4bLKd4?si=Q_JGEZnV-tpFa1Tb

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. nickpp+BX1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 18:09:45
>>iamfli+Iv1
I am sorry, I greatly respect and admire Nick Cave, but that letter sounded to me like the lament of a scribe decrying the invention of the printing press.

He's not wrong, something is lost and it has to do with what we call our "humanity", but the benefits greatly outweigh that loss.

[go to top]