zlacker

[return to "We have reached an agreement in principle for Sam to return to OpenAI as CEO"]
1. tomohe+V[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:08:13
>>staran+(OP)
So, Ilya is out of the board, but Adam is still on it. I know this will raise some eyebrows but whatever.

Still though, this isn't something that will just go away with Sam back. OAI will undergo serious changes now that Sam has shown himself to be irreplaceable. Future will tell but in the long terms, I doubt we will see OAI as one of the megacorps like Facebook or Uber. They lost the trust.

◧◩
2. Terrif+D2[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:19:15
>>tomohe+V
The OpenAI of the past, that dabbled in random AI stuff (remember their DotA 2 bot?), is gone.

OpenAI is now just a vehicle to commercialize their LLM - and everything is subservient to that goal. Discover a major flaw in GPT4? You shut your mouth. Doesn’t matter if society at large suffers for it.

Altman's/Microsoft’s takeover of the former non-profit is now complete.

Edit: Let this be a lesson to us all. Just because something claims to be non-profit doesn't mean it will always remain that way. With enough political maneuvering and money, a megacorp can takeover almost any organization. Non-profit status and whatever the organization's charter says is temporary.

◧◩◪
3. karmas+L4[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:33:17
>>Terrif+D2
> now just a vehicle to commercialize their LLM

I mean it is what they want isn't it. They did some random stuff like, playing dota2 or robot arms, even the Dalle stuff. Now they finally find that one golden goose, of course they are going to keep it.

I don't think the company has changed at all. It succeeded after all.

◧◩◪◨
4. nextac+L5[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:39:05
>>karmas+L4
But it's not exactly a company. It's a nonprofit structured in a way to wholly own a company. In that sense it's like Mozilla.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. karmas+y7[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:49:28
>>nextac+L5
Nonprofit is a just a facade, it was convenient for them to appear as ethnical under that disguise, but they get rid of it when it is inconvenient in a week. 95% of them would rather join MSFT, than being in a non-profit.

Did they company change? I am not convinced.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. ravst3+Wd[view] [source] 2023-11-22 07:33:53
>>karmas+y7
Agree that it's a facade.

Iirc, the NP structure was implemented to attract top AI talent from FAANG. Then they needed investors to fund the infrastructure and hence gave the employees shares or profit units (whatever the hell that is). The NP now shields MSFT from regulatory issues.

I do wonder how many of those employees would actually go to MSFT. It feels more like a gambit to get Altman back in since they were about to cash out with the tender offer.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. dizzyd+EQ1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 17:41:05
>>ravst3+Wd
Does it actually prevent regulators going after them?
[go to top]