zlacker

[return to "We have reached an agreement in principle for Sam to return to OpenAI as CEO"]
1. gzer0+B1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:12:23
>>staran+(OP)
Satya on twitter:

We are encouraged by the changes to the OpenAI board. We believe this is a first essential step on a path to more stable, well-informed, and effective governance. Sam, Greg, and I have talked and agreed they have a key role to play along with the OAI leadership team in ensuring OAI continues to thrive and build on its mission. We look forward to building on our strong partnership and delivering the value of this next generation of AI to our customers and partners.

https://twitter.com/satyanadella/status/1727207661547233721

◧◩
2. qsi+w2[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:18:47
>>gzer0+B1
>> a first essential step on a path to more stable, well-informed, and effective governance.

That's quite a slap at the board... a polite way of calling them ignorant, ineffective dilettantes.

◧◩◪
3. adastr+E2[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:19:26
>>qsi+w2
Yet one of them is still on the board…
◧◩◪◨
4. estoma+U2[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:21:11
>>adastr+E2
Not sure why that would be contradictory.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. adastr+a3[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:21:58
>>estoma+U2
Well then there’s still a “ignorant, ineffective dilettante“ making up 1/3 of the board.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. estoma+f5[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:36:15
>>adastr+a3
Firstly, maybe don't put quotes around an unrelated party's representation of the board. Secondly, the board was made up of individuals and naturally, what might be true for the board as a whole does not apply to every individual on it.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. adastr+Nt[view] [source] 2023-11-22 09:40:41
>>estoma+f5
I don’t understand this comment. I’m quoting from this thread, from the post that I was responding to. What do you think I was talking about?
[go to top]