zlacker

[return to "We have reached an agreement in principle for Sam to return to OpenAI as CEO"]
1. transc+32[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:15:37
>>staran+(OP)
Assuming they weren’t LARPing, that Reddit account claiming to have been in the room when this was all going down must be nervous. They wrote all kinds of nasty things about Sam, and I’m assuming the signatures on the “bring him back” letter would narrow down potential suspects considerably.

Edit: For those who may have missed it in previous threads, see https://old.reddit.com/user/Anxious_Bandicoot126

◧◩
2. epups+Gc[view] [source] 2023-11-22 07:24:30
>>transc+32
Why can't these safety advocates just say what they are afraid of? As it currently stands, the only "danger" in ChatGPT is that you can manipulate it into writing something violent or inappropriate. So what? Is this some San Francisco sensibilities here, where reading about fictional violence is equated to violence? The more people raise safety concerns in the abstract, the more I ignore it.
◧◩◪
3. robryk+Fj[view] [source] 2023-11-22 08:17:40
>>epups+Gc
Consider that your argument could also be used to advocate for safety of starting to use coal-fired steam engines (in 19th century UK): there's no immediate direct problem, but competitive pressures force everyone to use them and any externalities stemming from that are basically unavoidable.
[go to top]