zlacker

[return to "We have reached an agreement in principle for Sam to return to OpenAI as CEO"]
1. arduan+L3[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:26:18
>>staran+(OP)
Larry Summers is an excellent pick to call out bullshit and moderate any civil war, such as this EA - e/acc feud.

Kissinger (R, foreign policy) once said that Summers (D, economic policy) should be given an advisory post in any WH administration, to help shoot down bad ideas.

◧◩
2. vinter+35[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:35:30
>>arduan+L3
Those are both terrible people, not in fact brilliant general-purpose bad idea rejectors. A random person would be better qualified to shoot down bad ideas - most people haven't had bad ideas that led to suffering and death for millions of people.

No one thinks Larry Summers has any insights on AI. Adding Larry Summers is something you do purely to beg powerful, unaccountable people "please don't stop us, we're on your side".

◧◩◪
3. arduan+56[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:41:06
>>vinter+35
How is Larry Summers a terrible person?

He did help shoot down the extra spending proposals that would have made inflation today even worse. Not sure how that caused suffering and death for anyone.

And he is an adult, which is a welcome change from the previous clowncar of a board.

◧◩◪◨
4. Sakos+u9[view] [source] 2023-11-22 07:02:45
>>arduan+56
His influence significantly reduced the size of the stimulus bill, which meant significantly higher unemployment for a longer duration and significantly less spending on infrastructure which is so beneficial to economic growth that it can't be understated. Yes, millions of people suffered because of him.

The fact that you think current inflation has anything to do with that stimulus bill back then shows how little you understand about any of this.

Larry Summers is the worst kind of person. Somebody who is nothing but a corporate stooge trying to act like the adult by being "reasonable", when that just means enriching his corporate friends, letting people suffer and not spending money (which any study will tell you is not the correct approach to situations like this because of multiplying effects they have down the line).

Some necessary reading:

https://archive.ph/FU1F

https://archive.li/23tUR

https://archive.li/9Ji4C

In regards to watering it down to get GOP votes: https://archive.nytimes.com/krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/0...

[go to top]