zlacker

[return to "We have reached an agreement in principle for Sam to return to OpenAI as CEO"]
1. tomohe+V[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:08:13
>>staran+(OP)
So, Ilya is out of the board, but Adam is still on it. I know this will raise some eyebrows but whatever.

Still though, this isn't something that will just go away with Sam back. OAI will undergo serious changes now that Sam has shown himself to be irreplaceable. Future will tell but in the long terms, I doubt we will see OAI as one of the megacorps like Facebook or Uber. They lost the trust.

◧◩
2. ilikeh+72[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:15:42
>>tomohe+V
OAI looks stronger than ever. The untrustworthy bits that caused all this instability over the last 5 days have been ditched into the sea. Care to expand on your claim?
◧◩◪
3. neta13+33[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:21:38
>>ilikeh+72
Please explain your claim as well. I don’t see how this company looks stronger than ever, more like a clown company
◧◩◪◨
4. ilikeh+w4[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:31:39
>>neta13+33
I may have been overly eager in my comment because the big bad downside of the new board is none of the founders are on it. I hope the current membership sees reason and fixes this issue.

But I said this because: They've retained the entire company, reinstated its founder as CEO, and replaced an activist clown board with a professional, experienced, and possibly* unified one. Still remains to be seen how the board membership and overall org structure changes, but I have much more trust in the current 3 members steering OpenAI toward long-term success.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. MVisse+d9[view] [source] 2023-11-22 07:00:54
>>ilikeh+w4
If by “long-term-success” you mean a capitalistic lap-dog of microsoft, I’ll agree.

It seems that the safety team within OpenAI lost. My biggest fear with this whole AI thing is hostile takeover, and openAI was best positioned to at least do an effort to prevent that. Now, I’m not so sure anymore.

[go to top]