zlacker

>>staran+(OP)
Once again the source is directly from Twitter / X and the news was announced from there.

Dispelling the complete nonsense that the platform is 'dying'.

>>rvz+Q
FWIW I've just read the tweet on Nitter, haven't had a Twitter account in more than 2 years.

>>mastaz+X2
Well that's got very little to do with their point (which isn't very relevant anyway)

>>wilg+n3
Their point is that whether or not the platform is "dying" would depend on whether or not Twitter is still the best way to "get news".

But the most common metrics for whether or not a social media platform is dying, are things like ad revenue and MAU.

I contribute to neither, since I'm not a user nor an ad viewer, and yet I'm still able to "get the news".

So my point is this: the fact that important news are still there, won't guarantee that the platform stays successfull