zlacker

[return to "Emmet Shear statement as Interim CEO of OpenAI"]
1. rutier+v9[view] [source] 2023-11-20 10:04:59
>>jk_tec+(OP)
> I was happily avoiding full time employment. I took this job because I believe that OpenAI is one of the most important companies currently in existence. When the board shared the situation and asked me to take the role, I did not make the decision lightly. Ultimately I felt that I had a duty to help if I could.

An external CEO that's stepping in not because they want to but because they feel they "need" to doesn't sound like a recipe for success.

◧◩
2. cthalu+Tb[view] [source] 2023-11-20 10:21:12
>>rutier+v9
He's an 'AGI potentially poses an existential threat' guy. He's given his p(doom) as being somewhere between 5 and 50 percent. If the people in charge of potentially making a thing you think could have up to a 50% chance of wiping out humanity are asking you if you can help, you're probably going to offer whatever help you can.
◧◩◪
3. Random+Mg[view] [source] 2023-11-20 10:58:29
>>cthalu+Tb
With his probability estimates that high, he should probably do everything in his power to stop all development.
◧◩◪◨
4. RcouF1+ei[view] [source] 2023-11-20 11:08:25
>>Random+Mg
At that high of a probability of doom, one could argue that the most ethical thing to do is to assassinate everyone involved in AI research. Probability of doom x number of people affected is .05 x 8 billion == 400 million, versus a few thousand AI researchers.

Of course, no one really believes the probability of doom is that high.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Zak+W61[view] [source] 2023-11-20 15:24:53
>>RcouF1+ei
Even with purely utilitarian ethics, that wouldn't be ethical because it wouldn't work.

I'm not an AI researcher, but I know what a neural network is, I've implemented a machine learning algorithm or two, and I can read a CS paper. Once the luddite cult murdering AI researchers was dead or imprisoned, I suspect the demand for mediocre self-taught AI researchers would be increased and I might be motivated to become one.

If you somehow managed to destroy all copies of the best recent research, there are still many people with enough general knowledge of the techniques used who aren't currently working in the field to get things back to the current level of technology in under a decade given a few billion dollars to spend on it. Several of them are probably reading HN.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. kridsd+Wj6[view] [source] 2023-11-21 20:18:44
>>Zak+W61
I think that what you wrote here makes you an AI Researcher.

If you were Iranian and said "I'm not a nuclear physicist, but I do know the math and I have built a small reactor." I would strongly suggest you be on the lookout for Mossad agents.

[go to top]