zlacker

>>koie+(OP)
No, they can't "correct reasoning errors", and that's a clickbait title.

>>einpok+xj
They can produce text that is more sound than prior text that appeared earlier in the same input, when interim text indicates that something in the earlier block was unsound. (Sometimes)

It's the same pattern you'd see in a pedagological article about correcting reasoning errors, except that it's able to generate some share of the article content on its own.

With more layers of post-processing behind a curtain, you might be able to build an assembly over this behavior that looked convincingly like it was correcting reasoning errors on its own.

So... yes and no.