I appreciate the idea of being a "not-greedy typical company," but there's a reason you e.g. separate university type research or non-profits and private companies.
Trying to make up something in the middle is the exact sort of naivete you can ALWAYS expect from Silicon Valley.
I'd say yes, Sutsksever is... naive? though very smart. Or just utopian. Seems he couldn't get the scale he needed/wanted out of a university (or Google) research lab. But the former at least would have bounded things better in the way he would have preferred, from an ethics POV.
Jumping into bed with Musk and Altman and hoping for ethical non-profit "betterment of humanity" behaviour is laughable. Getting access to capital was obviously tempting, but ...
As for Altman. No, he's not naive. Amoral, and likely proud of it. JFC ... Worldcoin... I can't even...
I don't want either of these people in charge of the future, frankly.
It does point to the general lack of funding for R&D of this type of thing. Or it's still too early to be doing this kind of thing at scale. I dunno.
Bleak.
Honestly, this seems like a pretty good outcome.
Which is to say, I think the fearmongering sentient AI stuff is silly -- but I think we are all DEFINITELY better off with an ugly rough-and-tumble visible rocky start to the AI revolution.
Weed out the BS; equalize out who actually has access to the best stuff BEFORE some jerk company can scale up fast and dominate market share; let a de-facto "open source" market have a go at the whole thing.