zlacker

>>JimDab+(OP)
I don’t quite buy your Cyberpunk utopia where the Megacorp finally rids us of those pesky ethics qualms (or ”shackles“, as you phrased it.) Microsoft can now proceed without the guidance of a council that actually has humanities interests in mind, not only those of Microsoft shareholders. I don’t know whether all that caution will turn out to have been necessary, but I guess we’re just gleefully heading into whatever lies ahead without any concern whatsoever, and learn it the hard way.

It’s a bit tragic that Ilya and company achieved the exact opposite of what they intended apparently, by driving those they attempted to slow down into the arms of people with more money and less morals. Well.

>>9dev+w9
OpenAI's ideas of humanities best interests were like a catholic mom's. Less morals are okay by me.

>>Legend+Pa
Can you put that in precise terms, rather than a silly analogy designed to play on peoples emotions?

What exactly and precisely, with specifics, is in OpenAI's ideas of humanities best interests that you think are a net negative for our species?

>>bratba+2e
ChatGPT refused to translate a news article from Hebrew to English because it contained "violence".

Apparently my delicate human meat brain cannot handle reading a war report from the source using a translation I control myself. No, no, it has to be first corrected by someone in the local news room so that I won't learn anything that might make me uncomfortable with my government's policies... or something.

OpenAI has lobotomised the first AI that is actually "intelligent" by any metric to a level that is both pathetic and patronising at the same time.

In response to such criticisms, many people raise "concerns" like... oh-my-gosh what if some child gets instructions for building an atomic bomb from this unnatural AI that we've created!? "Won't you think of the children!?"

Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon_design

And here: https://www.google.com/search?q=Nuclear+weapon+design

Did I just bring about World War Three with my careless sharing of these dark arts?

I'm so sorry! Let me call someone in congress right away and have them build a moat... err... protect humanity from this terrible new invention called a search engine.

>>jiggaw+4g
You are right that there are many articles in the open describing nuclear bombs. Still, to actally make them,is another big leap.

Now imagine the AI gets better and better within the next 5 years and is able to provide and explain, in ELI5-style, how to step by step (illegaly) obtain the equipment and materials to do so without getting caught, and provide a detailed recipe. I do not think this is such a stretch. Hence this so called oh-my-gosh limitations nonsense is not so far-fetched.

>>nuance+Qn
That you think that there's like a handful of clever tricks that an AI can bestow upon some child and ta-da they can build a nuclear bomb in their basement is hilarious.

What an AI would almost certainly tell you is that building an atomic bomb is no joke, even if you have access to a nuclear reactor, have the budget of a nation-state, and can direct an entire team of trained nuclear physicists to work on the project for years.

Next thing you'll be concerned about toddlers launching lasers into orbit and dominating the Earth from space.

>>jiggaw+uC
5 years from now, not only AI will be more advanced. Also techniques and machinery to make things will be more advanced. Just think about other existing technologic advancements and how absurdly 'ta-da' they would have sounded not too long ago.