zlacker

[return to "OpenAI board in discussions with Sam Altman to return as CEO"]
1. mariaa+Xf1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 08:16:41
>>medler+(OP)
If Altman gets to return, it’s the goodbye of AI ethics within OpenAI and the elimination of the nonprofit. Also, I believe that hiring him back because of “how much he is loved by people within OpenAI” is like forgetting that a corrupt president did what they did. In all honesty, that has precedent, so it wouldn’t be old news. Also, I read a lot of people here saying this is about engineers vs scientists…I believe that people don’t understand that Data Scientists are full stack engineers. Ilya is one. Greg has just been inspiring people and stopped properly coding with the team a long time ago. Sam never did any code and the vision of an AGI comes from Ilya…Even if Mira now sides with Sam, I believe there’s a lot of social pressure for the employees to support Sam and it shouldn’t be like that. Again, I do believe OpenAI was and is a collective effort. But, I wouldn’t treat Sam as the messiah or compare him to Steve Jobs. That’s indecent towards Steve Jobs who was actually a UX designer.
◧◩
2. mitrev+Fi1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 08:42:46
>>mariaa+Xf1
The codebase of an LLM is the size of a high school exam project. There is little to no coding in machine learning. That is the sole reason why they are overvalued - any company can write its own in a flash. You only require hardware to train and inference.
◧◩◪
3. andy_p+Zj1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 08:56:04
>>mitrev+Fi1
If it's so simple why does Chat GPT 4 perform better than almost everything else...
◧◩◪◨
4. Galanw+fm1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 09:17:56
>>andy_p+Zj1
You're not really answering the question here.

Parent's point is that GPT-4 is better because they invested more money (was that ~$60M?) in training infrastructure, not because their core logic is more advanced.

I'm not arguing for one or the other, just restating parent's point.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. andy_p+9p1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 09:44:02
>>Galanw+fm1
Are you really saying Google can't spend $60m or much more to compete? Again if it is so easy as spending money on compute Amazon and Google would have just spent the money by now and Bard would be as good as Chat GPT, but for most things it is not even as good as Chat GPT 3.5.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. pk-pro+Hq1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 09:57:28
>>andy_p+9p1
You should already be aware of the secret sauce of ChatGPT by now: MoE + RLHF. Making MoE profitable is a different story. But, of course, that is not the only part. OpenAI does very obvious things to make GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo better than other models, and this is hidden in the training data. Some of these obvious things have already been discovered, but some of them we just can't see yet. However, if you see how close Phind V7 34B is to the quality of GPT-4, you'll understand that the gap is not wide enough to eliminate the competition.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. jacque+SE1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 12:12:18
>>pk-pro+Hq1
This is very much true. Competitive moats can be built on surprisingly small edges. I've built a tiny empire on top of a bug.
[go to top]