zlacker

[return to "OpenAI board in discussions with Sam Altman to return as CEO"]
1. skygaz+R1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 23:01:16
>>medler+(OP)
Man, the board already looked reckless and incompetent, but this solidifies the appearance. You can do crazy ill-advised things, but if you unwaveringly commit, we’ll always wonder if you’re secretly a genius. But when you immediately backtrack, we’ll know you were a fool all along.
◧◩
2. eigenv+Qa[view] [source] 2023-11-18 23:44:22
>>skygaz+R1
They are already the dumbest board in history (even dumber than Apple’s board firing Steve Jobs). So it’s not out of keeping with anything. Besides, those 2 independent board members (who couldn’t do fizz-buzz if their lives depended on it) won’t be staying long if Sam returns— nor are they likely to ever serve on any board ever again after their shenanigans.
◧◩◪
3. spacem+ke[view] [source] 2023-11-19 00:00:40
>>eigenv+Qa
Some of the board member choices are baffling. Like why is Joseph Gordon Levitt’s wife on the board? Her startup has under 10 employees and has a personal email address as the contact address on the homepage.
◧◩◪◨
4. ivan_g+kh[view] [source] 2023-11-19 00:16:10
>>spacem+ke
I guess you missed the part about Amal Clooney‘s husband at the Golden Globes. It’s 2023, why are we still referring people like that?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Taek+6k[view] [source] 2023-11-19 00:32:23
>>ivan_g+kh
The insinuation is that her most notable accolade is the man she married and there are cases where that's an accurate insinuation.

I have no idea who she is or what her accolades are, but I do know who JGL is and therefore referring to her like that is in fact useful to me, where using any other name is not.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. ivan_g+7A1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 11:31:01
>>Taek+6k
Could you please elaborate how is this fact useful to you? Can it be that you just make certain stereotypical assumptions from it?
[go to top]