zlacker

[return to "OpenAI board in discussions with Sam Altman to return as CEO"]
1. shmatt+by[view] [source] 2023-11-19 02:10:04
>>medler+(OP)
This makes no sense. People are calling what the board did a coup, but Altman is trying (failing?) to stage a coup.

The board was Altmans boss - this is pretty much their only job. Altman knew this and most likely ignored any questions or concerns of theirs thinking he is the unfireable superstar

Imagine if your boss fired you - and your response was - I’ll come back if you quit! Yeah, no. People might confuse status with those of actual ceo shareholders like zuck, bezos, or musk. But Altman is just another employee

The shareholders can fire the board, but that’s not what he’s asking for. And so far we haven’t heard anything about them getting fired. So mostly this just seems like an egomaniac employee who thinks he is the company (while appropriating the work of some really really smart data scientists)

◧◩
2. comfys+7G[view] [source] 2023-11-19 02:57:15
>>shmatt+by
I think this article represents a tactical press release from Sam’s camp. Company in “free fall” without Sam? It’s not even Monday yet.
◧◩◪
3. x86x87+qI[view] [source] 2023-11-19 03:11:27
>>comfys+7G
yeah. this whole thing looks staged. not saying it's not possible but what kind of board would actually fire the CEO and take it back to resign?
◧◩◪◨
4. jacque+dP[view] [source] 2023-11-19 03:58:19
>>x86x87+qI
The board that has been threatened to be sued individually and collectively by some of the most well known names in IT. They're probably wondering how they can get out of this with their reputations and ego's in one piece. You may have the legal authority to do something but if you don't have the support (or worse: if you haven't checked that you have the support) then it's not exactly the best move.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. jcranm+L41[view] [source] 2023-11-19 06:17:47
>>jacque+dP
It's also worth remembering that Sam Altman is also seeking to get out of this with his reputation and ego in one piece. Definitely in his interest to be able to portray the board as coming crawling back to him after kicking him out the door, even if that is, well, less than candid communication of what has happened.

And the evidence that we've seen so far doesn't refute the idea that the board isn't seriously considering taking him back on. The statements we've seen are entirely consistent with "there was a petition to bring him back sent to the board and nothing happened after that."

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. jacque+Hw1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 10:53:28
>>jcranm+L41
Yes, that is correct.
[go to top]