zlacker

[return to "OpenAI board in discussions with Sam Altman to return as CEO"]
1. meetpa+Kv[view] [source] 2023-11-19 01:55:59
>>medler+(OP)
Update on the OpenAI drama: Altman and the board had till 5pm to reach a truce where the board would resign and he and Brockman would return. The deadline has passed and mass resignations expected if a deal isn’t reached ASAP

https://twitter.com/alexeheath/status/1726055095341875545

◧◩
2. thinkc+HH[view] [source] 2023-11-19 03:06:39
>>meetpa+Kv
This does not solve the company's California AG problem.

https://www.plainsite.org/posts/aaron/r8huu7s/

◧◩◪
3. alexal+8a1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 07:13:25
>>thinkc+HH
Hey I know something about this! I just mailed my organization's RRF-1 a couple of days ago. The author of this post seems to be confused. My organization is on the same fiscal year as OpenAI, and our RRF-1 had to be mailed by November 15th. That explains the supposed "six month" delay. Second, if it's mailed on November 15th, it might not have even been received yet, let alone processed. This post feels like grasping at straws on the basic facts, setting aside the fact that it just doesn't make any sense to imagine a board member filling out the RRF-1 and going "oh wait, was there financial fraud?" the morning of November 15th. (That's ... not how the world works? Under CA law, any nonprofit with 2M of more in revenue has to undergo an audit, which is typically completed before filling out the 990, and the 990 is a pre-req for submitting the RRF-1. That's where you'd expect to catch this stuff, and the board's audit committee would certainly be involved in reviewing the results well in advance.)
[go to top]