zlacker

>>apsec1+(OP)
Sutskever: "You can call it (a coup), and I can understand why you chose this word, but I disagree with this. This was the board doing its duty to the mission of the nonprofit, which is to make sure that OpenAI builds AGI that benefits all of humanity."

Scoop: theinformation.com

https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1725707548106580255

>>convex+X1
Some insider details that seem to agree with this: https://www.reddit.com/user/Anxious_Bandicoot126/

>>smharr+ve
Who is u/Anxious_Bandicoot126? Is there any reason to think this is actually a person at OpenAI and not some random idiot on the internet? They have no comment history except on this issue. Seems like BS.

>>dimal+Co1
No comment history except on this issue...

That's either 100% fishy or 100% insider.

Either BS or person is insider, no in-between.

>>hello_+fP1
Is this sarcasm? The burden is on the person with the supposed claim to show they are trustworthy and reputable. What you're saying is basically "coin shows heads 50% of the time, therefore it's 50% chance they're an insider".

>>Shamel+GW1
That's not how whistleblower to the public works.