zlacker

[return to "Berkeley Mono Typeface"]
1. ChrisM+891[view] [source] 2023-11-19 01:17:15
>>gjvc+(OP)
It's nice, but I don't want to be paying for my principal developer font, when there are dozens of free alternatives.

I am also hesitant about working (even free) third-party tools into my workflow. I have had the pleasure of dealing with these tools going belly-up (a couple just did, but they were important -not critical).

◧◩
2. inferi+2c1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 01:41:09
>>ChrisM+891

  I am also hesitant about working (even free) third-party tools into my workflow.
What?
◧◩◪
3. ChrisM+Dc1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 01:44:25
>>inferi+2c1
"Hesitant about" -not the same thing as "refuse to"

I use Xcode. Arguably, it's "free," if you ignore the fact that I run it on a $4,000 computer, but it is also the OS maker's tool of choice.

But each tool I add, each dependency in my workflow, is another rusty link in the chain.

I feel that we have gotten a bit too comfortable with adding ingredients to the stew.

A font isn't really that big a deal (unless you sell them). Things like documentation generators and linters, are more substantial (and I just had to remove both from my workflow, because they don't seem to have survived the shift to Xcode 15).

◧◩◪◨
4. inferi+zd1[view] [source] 2023-11-19 01:51:12
>>ChrisM+Dc1
Sorry, the question is: what third party software are you talking about?
[go to top]