zlacker

[return to "Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive"]
1. V__+r8[view] [source] 2023-11-16 16:53:45
>>mikece+(OP)
Signal had 40 million active users in 2021 [1]. With 14 million in infra cost, that comes to .35 per user/year. Total expenses are about 33 million, so about .825 per user/year. All in all that seems very reasonable.

[1] https://www.businessofapps.com/data/signal-statistics/

◧◩
2. rogerk+Q8[view] [source] 2023-11-16 16:55:16
>>V__+r8
Based on App Store downloads on both platforms, they are well over 200M at this point.
◧◩◪
3. nvy+Rg[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:24:48
>>rogerk+Q8
A lot of people, myself included, have it installed but never use it after they dropped SMS support.

Only a tiny fraction of my contacts use Signal, and most of those are also on Whatsapp, Telegram, Discord, and others.

Signal offers essentially nothing to me.

◧◩◪◨
4. rasso+js[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:11:25
>>nvy+Rg
Except real privacy?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. sam_lo+Ct[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:16:44
>>rasso+js
Not even that, because it is linked to phone numbers.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Oooooo+9A[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:51:05
>>sam_lo+Ct
Afaik you can crrate an account without a number.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. wkat42+3B[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:55:17
>>Oooooo+9A
No. You can just hide it from other users in group chats now (and perhaps 1:1, didn't yet check but you still need one to sign up)
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. Obscur+ui7[view] [source] 2023-11-18 13:40:55
>>wkat42+3B
Does that require the sealed-sender thingy?
[go to top]