zlacker

>>convex+(OP)
It seems like firing Sam and causing this massive brain drain might be antithetical to the whole AGI mission of the original non-profit. If OpenAI loses everyone to Sam and he starts some new AI company, it probably won't be capped-profit and just be a normal company. All of the organizational safeguards OpenAI had inked with Microsoft and protection against "selling AGI" once-developed are out-the-window if he just builds AGI at a new company.

I'm not saying this will happen, but it seems to me like an incredibly silly move.

>>Shank+Qf
Hi, can we talk about the elephant in the room? I see breathless talk about "AGI" here, as if it's just sitting in Altman's basement and waiting to be unleashed.

We barely understand how consciousness works, we should stop talking about "AGI". It is just empty, ridiculous techno-babble. Sorry for the harsh language, there's no nice way to drive home this point.

>>kashya+Vs
Why not? It's on topic.

Should people discussing nuclear energy not talk about fusion?

>>fennec+1v
We know that fusion is a very common process that inevitably happens to even the simplest elements if you just make them hot enough, we just don't know how to do that in a controlled manner. We don't really know what intelligence is, how it came about, or how we would ever recreate it artificially or if that's possible. LLMs are some pretty convincing tricks though but that's on the level of making some loud noises behind a curtain and calling it fusion.