zlacker

[return to "Three senior researchers have resigned from OpenAI"]
1. aidama+67[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:11:23
>>convex+(OP)
GPT5 pre-training just ended I believe. Brock, Pachocki, Szymon Sidor, would have likely all been involved.

These are huge losses. Pachocki led pre-training for GPT-4, and probably GPT-5. Brockman is the major engineer responsible for the efficiency improvements that enabled ChatGPT and GPT-4 to be even remotely cost-effective. That is a piece that is often overlooked, but OpenAI's advantage over the competition in compute efficiency is probably even larger than the model itself.

◧◩
2. convex+l8[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:22:14
>>aidama+67
"Greg Brockman works 60 to 100 hours per week, and spends around 80% of the time coding. Former colleagues have described him as the hardest-working person at OpenAI."

https://time.com/collection/time100-ai/6309033/greg-brockman...

◧◩◪
3. romafi+Je[view] [source] 2023-11-18 09:18:00
>>convex+l8
Seriously, do we honestly believe 80 hours a week coding is a good thing. What, is he this bad at coding.

What about he spends 4 hours a week coding cause he’s so good at coding.

Way more impressive.

◧◩◪◨
4. andirk+Lg[view] [source] 2023-11-18 09:36:28
>>romafi+Je
Might as well add LOC as a metric. Both can mean the person is extremely inefficient, over-engineering everything, and their eyes are begging for a break.

However! The best engineers I've been around do work a lot and they like it.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Xenoam+Dn[view] [source] 2023-11-18 10:33:34
>>andirk+Lg
I’m not sure why it’s seen as ok to work 100 hours per week, or even glorified.

If instead of work it was something else it would be seen as a problem. 100 hours per week doesn’t leave room for anything else other than basic human needs.

“They like it”, well all addicts like what they’re addicted to, it doesn’t mean it’s healthy.

[go to top]