zlacker

>>aarond+(OP)
If anything this is a power grab by the board away from Microsoft. Optimistically, this could be an attempt to return OpenAI to its original status as a true non-profit company. OpenAI lost most of its openness under Sam.

They needed the Microsoft investment before GPT scaling was proven out. I imagine many entities would be willing to put money into a truly open research lab given OpenAI’s track record.

>>valine+Z3
Microsoft gave them billions of dollars and access to lots of high performance compute, why would the board want to jeopardize that now?

>>speedy+X4
"Gave" is the operative term here. It only matters what will Microsoft offer in the future.

OpenAI (the board that made this decision) is still ultimately a non-profit, so it's possible that interests might not be aligned.

>>beejiu+27
> so it's possible that interests might not be aligned.

Tough luck, considering all the obligations they have to MS now.