zlacker

[return to "Ilya Sutskever "at the center" of Altman firing?"]
1. mvkel+1a[view] [source] 2023-11-18 03:55:40
>>apsec1+(OP)
Sam wanted to commercialize stuff to shoot for revenue. Ilya wants to keep pushing for gpt 4.5 and beyond, to hell with the revenue. Ilya won the argument, Sam out.

Hell yeah.

It's not safetyism vs accelerationism.

It's commercialization vs innovation.

◧◩
2. cactus+kh[view] [source] 2023-11-18 04:48:38
>>mvkel+1a
Commercialization is innovation. Without it they will end up with a cute toy and a bankrupt company.
◧◩◪
3. mvkel+bi[view] [source] 2023-11-18 04:54:31
>>cactus+kh
Eventually, sure. Right now, today, they have a blank check for compute and all the money they could ask for. It's not the time to try to monetize if AGI is the mission. Complete distraction
◧◩◪◨
4. fsocie+Vx[view] [source] 2023-11-18 07:07:47
>>mvkel+bi
AGI at all costs sounds more terrifying than monetizing ChatGPT. Seems like there could have been a balance to strike.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. edgyqu+eI[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:44:33
>>fsocie+Vx
They are a non-profit specifically founded to build AI, not to become a profitable company and chase revenue
[go to top]