zlacker

[return to "Three senior researchers have resigned from OpenAI"]
1. quickt+U4[view] [source] 2023-11-18 07:51:26
>>convex+(OP)
Makes me wonder whether to keep building upon OpenAI? Given that they have an API and it takes effort to build on that vs. something else. I am small fry but maybe other people are wondering the same? Can they give reassurances about their products going into the future?
◧◩
2. siva7+v5[view] [source] 2023-11-18 07:55:45
>>quickt+U4
I am wondering the same. It’s a PR desaster to their dev community and i’m not even sure if Sutskever isn’t secretly happy about this.
◧◩◪
3. karmas+g7[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:12:18
>>siva7+v5
I am at lost. Not fear, just lost.

Don't know what to do. Is my investment into their API still worth it? It feels very unstable at this moment.

◧◩◪◨
4. padols+n9[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:31:51
>>karmas+g7
If you're just using their completions/chat API, you're gonna be ok. As an ultimate fallback you can spin up H100s in the cloud and run VLLM atop a high param open model like Llama 70B. Such models will catch up and their param counts will increase.. eventually. But initially expect gpt-3.5-esque performance. VLLM will give you an OpenAI-like REST API atop a range of models. Keep making things :))
[go to top]