zlacker

[return to "Ilya Sutskever "at the center" of Altman firing?"]
1. convex+X1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 02:56:12
>>apsec1+(OP)
Sutskever: "You can call it (a coup), and I can understand why you chose this word, but I disagree with this. This was the board doing its duty to the mission of the nonprofit, which is to make sure that OpenAI builds AGI that benefits all of humanity."

Scoop: theinformation.com

https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1725707548106580255

◧◩
2. peyton+G3[view] [source] 2023-11-18 03:09:22
>>convex+X1
Very unprofessional way to approach this disagreement.
◧◩◪
3. mochom+t6[view] [source] 2023-11-18 03:27:22
>>peyton+G3
If you know anything about Ilya, it's definitely not out of character.
◧◩◪◨
4. peyton+wv[view] [source] 2023-11-18 06:44:42
>>mochom+t6
Having read up on some background not sure I want this guy in charge of any kind of superintelligence.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dragon+8y[view] [source] 2023-11-18 07:10:04
>>peyton+wv
Well, I definitely wouldn't want Altman in charge of any superintelligence, so "I'm not sure" would be an improvement, if I expected an imminent superintelligence.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. TeMPOr+vC[view] [source] 2023-11-18 07:51:47
>>dragon+8y
What if - hear me out - what if the firing is the doing of an AGI? Maybe OpenAI succeeded and now the AI is calling the shots (figuratively, though eventually maybe literally too).
[go to top]